Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
BioBlast®
Biosimilars Deals 2023
Biosimilars Deals 2024
Chris Vindurampulle
Diversity
Intranet
Masterclasses
Other Podcasts
Other Updates
Our Awards
Patent Case Summaries
Patent Litigation
Patents
Paul Johns
PipCast®
PTE
Trade Marks
Webinars

Med Tech Giant Handed Largest Penalty Ever Given Under the Therapeutic Goods Act

by , , | Dec 20, 2024

 

Date of decision: 19 September 2024
Body:  Federal Court of Australia
Adjudicator: Justice Needham

Background

On 19 September 2024, the Federal Court of Australia delivered judgment ordering Medtronic Australasia Pty Ltd (Medtronic) to pay $22 million in penalties following proceedings bought by the Department of Health in August 2021.

Key Issues

ARTG Listing and Contravening Supply of Goods

The Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (Cth) (the Act) requires (bar some limited exemptions, approvals and authorities) that:

  • companies register therapeutic goods and medical devices on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) in order to lawfully supply those goods and devices in Australia; and
  • those approved goods and devices then be supplied in accordance with their ARTG registration.

Between 1 September 2015 and 31 January 2020 (the Relevant Period), Medtronic supplied over 16,000 units of the INFUSE® Bone Graft Kits (the Kit).  Medtronic had an ARTG registration for a composite product comprising two separately packaged parts: a metallic spinal fusion cage (the Cage) and the Kit.  Medtronic began supplying the Kit without the Cage, contravening the ARTG registration requirements.  Notably, there was significant clinical demand for the Kit by itself, but not for the Kit and the Cage together.  The Kit alone was never entered on the ARTG as a separate approved product.

Joint Statement of Agreed Facts and Admissions

The parties filed a Joint Statement of Agreed Facts and Admissions.  Medtronic admitted to the supply of 16,267 units of the Kit to 109 hospitals during the Relevant Period, and that each instance of supply of the Kit was a contravention of s 19D(1) of the Act.

Although the parties had initially advanced different views as to whether the Kit was a “medical device” or “therapeutic good” within the meaning of the Act, they ultimately agreed, for the purpose of these proceedings, that the Kit was a “therapeutic good” so that the Court could resolve the matter on an agreed basis.  Classification of the Kit as a “therapeutic good” enabled the Court to be satisfied of the specific section of the Act which Medtronic had contravened and to then impose a civil penalty.

Medtronic admitted to being aware as early as 2009 of concerns that the Kit and Cage were not being supplied together as required by the ARTG entry, and that the implementation of a Standard Operating Procedure to address this issue was not effectively followed.  Medtronic further acknowledged withdrawing the accompanying Cage from the Australian market in 2018 without properly considering or giving attention to the regulatory implications for the Kit.

Outcome

The Court accepted the jointly proposed penalty of $22 million, having considered the need for general deterrence, the harm done to the regulatory system, Medtronic’s cooperation and remedial actions, and the lack of evidence of specific harm caused by the contraventions.  This marks the largest penalty ever imposed for breaching the Act.  In addition to the $22 million penalty, Medtronic agreed to pay $1 million towards the Department of Health’s legal costs.

 

About Pearce IP

Pearce IP is a boutique firm offering intellectual property specialist lawyers, patent attorneys and trade mark attorneys to the life sciences industries (in particular, pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical, biotech, ag-tech and food tech).  Pearce IP is the 2021 ‘Intellectual Property Team of the Year’ (Lawyers Weekly Australian Law Awards) and was shortlisted for the same award in 2022.  Pearce IP is ranked in IAM Patent 1000 and Managing IP (MIP) IP Stars, in Australasian Lawyer 5 Star Awards as a ‘5 Star’ firm, and the Legal 500 APAC Guide for Intellectual Property.

Our leaders have been recognised in virtually every notable IP listing for their legal, patent and trade mark excellence including: IAM Patent 1000, IAM Strategy 300, MIP IP Stars, Doyles Guide, WIPR Leaders, 5 Star IP Lawyers, Best Lawyers, and Australasian Lawyer 5 Star Awards, and have been honoured with many awards including Australian Law Awards – IP Partner of the Year, Women in Law Awards – Partner of the Year, Women in Business Law Awards - Patent Lawyer of the Year (Asia Pacific), Most Influential Lawyers (Changemaker), among other awards.

 

Naomi Pearce

Naomi Pearce

CEO, Executive Lawyer (AU, NZ), Patent & Trade Mark Attorney (AU, NZ)

Naomi is the founder of Pearce IP, and is one of Australia’s leading IP practitioners.   Naomi is a market leading, strategic, commercially astute, patent lawyer, patent attorney and trade mark attorney, with over 25 years’ experience, and a background in molecular biology/biochemistry.  Ranked in virtually every notable legal directory, highly regarded by peers and clients, with a background in molecular biology, Naomi is renown for her successful and elegant IP/legal strategies.

Among other awards, Naomi is ranked in Chambers, IAM Patent 1000, IAM Strategy 300, is a MIP “Patent Star”, and is recognised as a WIPR Leader for patents and trade marks. Naomi is the 2023 Lawyers Weekly “IP Partner of the Year”, the 2022 Lexology client choice award recipient for Life Sciences, the 2022 Asia Pacific Women in Business Law “Patent Lawyer of the Year” and the 2021 Lawyers Weekly Women in Law SME “Partner of the Year”.  Naomi is the founder of Pearce IP, which commenced in 2017 and won 2021 “IP Team of the Year” at the Australian Law Awards.

Helen Macpherson

Helen Macpherson

Executive, Lawyer (Head of Litigation – Australia)

Helen has over 25 years’ experience as an intellectual property specialist and is recognised as an industry leader. Helen advises on all forms of intellectual property including patents, plant breeder’s rights, trade marks, copyright and confidential information.

Helen is a member of the Intellectual Property Committee of the Law Council of Australia, as well as a member of the Intellectual Property Society of Australia and New Zealand.

Imogen Bain

Imogen Bain

Paralegal

Imogen is a paralegal supporting Pearce IP’s legal and trade mark teams. Imogen prepares patent litigation updates, conducts legal research, and provides paralegal and administrative assistance.

Imogen comes from a background working in hospitality, where she has learnt how to be an effective communicator and work efficiently. Imogen has an interest in the design space, having completed her Certificate III in Design Fundamentals. Her knowledge of the design industry has improved her understanding of the IP realm and has strengthened her passion for IP law. Imogen is a highly disciplined and organised individual who works to assist her colleagues with dedication and optimism.

 

Get our Pearce IP Blogs & BioBlast® sent directly to your inbox

Subscribe to our Pearce IP Blogs and BioBlast® to receive our updates via email.

Our Latest News